Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #73: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) has a clever idea for a plot that is executed by a rather oddball crew of artists. In the director’s chair you have Michel Gondry, a French filmmaker whose creativity is always recognisable no matter the project. On writing duties you have Charlie Kaufman, known for writing screenplays that seem to take on a life of their own. Then in front of the camera you have Jim Carrey in serious mode, which doesn’t always work, but the results are always interesting.

When the movie came out I was still used to the idea of Jim Carrey as a manic comedian since I grew up watching him in movies like Ace Ventura and The Mask. When he is in a drama you almost always expect him to eventually burst out and talk out of his butt. That might be why Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is not one of his biggest box-office successes, but even 13 years ago I could see this is a very smart movie dealing with deep ideas. Its characters are all convinced that in order to move on with their lives they should use technology to erase bad memories from their consciousness, an idea I sometimes find appealing. However Kaufman and Gondry seem to argue removing memories is akin to removing the symptoms and not the disease.

Carrey’s character, Joel Barrish, is a shy and withdrawn man who had the luck of meeting Clementine (Kate Winslet), the kind of extrovert who dyes her hair blue and approaches strangers on a train. They had a great relationship for a while until things unfortunately soured and ended with a bitter breakup. Things were so bitter that one day Joel runs into Clementine and she has no memories of him because she had them erased by a medical firm out of New York City.

Feeling betrayed, Joel decided to scrub Clementine out of his mind just like she did and never have to relive the painful memory of their breakup. He has worries of course. When going over the procedure with Dr. Mierzwiak (Tom Wilkinson) he asks about the possibility of brain damage, to which the good doctor replies: “Well, technically the procedure is brain damage, but it’s on par with a night of heavy drinking.” Well gee, isn’t comforting?

Yet Joel agrees to the procedure and at night technicians played by Kirsten Dunst, Elijah Wood and Mark Ruffalo come into his house to plug all manners of electrical devices into his head while he sleeps. This is when the movie starts to get visually creative as it jumps around Joel’s memory as the technicians erase all traces of Clementine. What Joel hadn’t thought about before signing off on this brain-damaging operation is that the technicians are also erasing the good memories of Clementine, which he realises he would like to keep so he starts to fight the procedure. Meanwhile, back in the real world, we see the technicians are having relationship problems of their own and that this technology might not be a perfect solution for heartbreak after all.

Getting inside a person’s brain allows Gondry and his team to have all sorts of fun, whether it’s having people completely vanish from a scene, jumping to Joel’s childhood, or Joel running into a faceless man because he only remembers seeing that man from behind. Over the years plenty of TV shows and movies have surpassed this concept, especially Christopher Nolan’s Inception, which has characters dig three layers deep into a person’s subconscious. However Gondry’s film still holds up both in terms of visual effects and ideas.


By the movie’s end most of the characters have come to the realization that erasing some of your bad memories is not going to make you feel any better or change who you are as a person. The old saying “those who do not learn history are bound to repeat it” seems to apply to people’s personal history as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #102: The Hustler

Robert Rossen’s The Hustler (1961) is proof that any sport can be used for good cinematic drama even if that sport is pool. Although this is not a game that involves a massive sport arena and bloody boxing gloves, things can get dramatically interesting if the monetary stakes are high, and visually arresting if the filmmakers shoot from the right angle. It also helps a lot if the man putting his money on the table is played by a young Paul Newman in a career-breaking role. Prior to watching the film I had a vague idea of the meaning of the word “hustling” and a rather passive interest in the game of pool. It’s a fun game to play if you are having a couple of nachos and chicken wings on a Friday evening with friends, but I didn’t see it as a spectator sport. Watching The Hustler in the classics section of Netflix two years ago was a bit of an education since it shows the sport as a way of life for some people, and a huge source of revenue for big time gamblers. Newman star as...