Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #114: The Conversation

In a world in which cameras and microphones are everywhere, from the street corners to our very own computers, The Conversation (1974) seems like a quaint and outdated thriller. It focuses on a man whose job is to spy on people, but at the same time said man is very protective of his own privacy and lives in constant fear of someone tapping his phone lines. However a major lesson of Francis Ford Coppola’s film, which still applies today, is that having a recording of someone’s private conversations is one thing, but knowing what to do with that information is whole other ball game.

When I first watched The Conversation it was probably about one year after Edward Snowden leaked classified information regarding the United States’ ability to spy on practically anyone not living in a cave. If you have a cell phone, a tablet, a laptop, or just a good old landline, they will find a way to listen to what you are saying. In 1998 Gene Hackman starred in Enemy of the State, a spiritual sequel of sorts to The Conversation, and his character goes on a rant about the government’s spying abilities. When that movie came out I remember seeing government officials on the news laughing at the movie, saying it greatly exaggerated their power. Sadly, today’s technology has caught up the paranoia of both The Conversation and Enemy of the State, and it is better to cover the camera on your laptop if you want a semblance of actual privacy.

Back in the 1970s recording a conversation between two individuals, especially if they were talking in a crowded and public place, was a difficult task, but not one above Harry Caul (Hackman). Living in a San Francisco office building designed to isolate him, Caul is a surveillance expert, which is a polite way of saying a spy. He is not a spy in the James Bond sense, rather in the sense that he is paid to record people’s words no matter who they are. Somehow everything Caul does is perfectly legal, and there are even conventions where he and his colleagues can peruse the latest surveillance gadgets that will make their jobs easier. Imagine what they would think of today’s iPhones.

What makes Caul one of cinema’s great characters, thanks to a solid performance by Hackman, is that he is a fascinating contradiction. His colleagues say he is one of the best in the surveillance business, yet at the same time he has problems having conversations of his own in social situations and very much values his privacy. Even worse for a man in his line of work, he begins to have questions about the morality of what he does, especially since one of his past recordings resulted in the deaths of three people. In order to assuage his strong Catholic guilt, he tells himself once the recording is handed over to his clients the situation is quite literally out of his hands.

His faith and conscience are severely put to the test when he realizes his client (Robert Duvall) might have nefarious intentions regarding a couple whose conversation he recorded at a crowded square. After cleaning out the audio with his colleague (John Cazale), Caul becomes obsessed with the meaning of the couple’s words and whether it might get them killed. When he delays in delivering the recording to his client’s threatening aide (Harrison Ford), Caul begins to think he too might become a target. Suddenly the spy is afraid the microphones could be recording him.


The scene in which Caul desperately tears apart his apartment in search of listening devices might look like a paranoid man gone insane, but by the end of the movie we have learned just because you’re paranoid it doesn’t mean they’re not listening. Today the spies don’t even have to install a listening bug in your lamps; instead they just have to hack the microphones that are already in your house. You want total privacy? If you are reading this online, then it probably means you don’t have it.  



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence.
My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks. This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a love for …

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #90: When Harry Met Sally...

There is an age-old question regarding whether single men and women can be just friends. In real life the answer is obviously “yes,” but in movies and TV the answer always has to be that at some point two single characters will get attracted to each other and move beyond friendship. On TV I find this to be contrived and overused, but some movies can have a lot of fun with the concept, most notably Rob Reiner’s comedy classic When Harry Met Sally…(1989). It may not change your view on love and friendship, but it forever changed the meaning of the phrase “I’ll have what she’s having.”
On paper this film’s premise sounds like another rom-com, but seen by oneself during an evening of Netflix binging it does make you think about deep stuff like the long-term impact of your decisions on your life. A person you meet during a tense trip might turn up again sometime later down the road in the most unexpected ways. If there is one thing I believe in it is infinite possibilities, and Nora Ephron…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #83: Brazil

Dystopian movies from the 1980s are a funny thing since we now live in the future of those movies and if you look at the news for more than five minutes it will feel as though we are one bad day away from being into a dystopia. On the plus side, if it ends up looking like the dystopia portrayed in Terry Gilliam’s Brazil (1985) at least we will have lovely architecture to look at while the government is busy telling us how to think. This might not be a movie that will cheer you up, but the production design is amazing, the performances are great throughout, and you get to see Robert DeNiro play a maintenance man/freedom fighter.
I first saw Brazil as a Terry Gilliam double feature at the Universit√© de Sherbrooke’s movie club paired along with 12 Monkeys around ten years ago. Those two films are similar in that they both feature a rather dour future and, as with most Gilliam movies, incredibly intricate sets. However the dystopian future in Brazil is somewhat scarier than the disease-ra…