Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #125: Breathless

I have noticed that the French have a love-hate relationship with the United States, with the love part generally due to Hollywood. One of the greatest examples of that loving relationship is Breathless (1960) a film directed by French film critic Jean-Luc Godard, starring a character attracted to the film persona of American actor Humphrey Bogart, and a French-speaking American expatriate as his girlfriend. The film’s plot is pretty simplistic, but at the time its use of jump cuts was something entirely new, and Godard’s style actually ended up influencing many American filmmakers such as Martin Scorsese, Steven Soderbergh, and Robert Altman.

This movie is a part of cinema history, but upon first viewing it seemed dated to me. I don’t mean the black and white cinematography, that is objectively gorgeous, but rather the story and characters. The movie was played as a double feature at a film club when I was at the University of Sherbrooke and it seemed to me the rest of the audience was also struggling to take it seriously. The next film, Pierrot le fou (1965), was not much of an improvement given the meandering plot and ridiculously bizarre ending. That being said, I can’t argue the two leads in Breathless embody the definition of cool in the 1960s.

Jean-Paul Belmondo, in a career-defining role, stars as Michel, a petty thief who goes on the run to Paris after stealing a car and shooting a police officer. Yet for a criminal Michel is very well-dressed with a suit, hat, sunglasses, and of course a cigarette frequently attached to his lips. No way around it, this guy looks like a movie star, and the same can be said for his love interest Patricia (Jean Seberg), a student and aspiring journalist who sells American newspapers in the streets.

That’s about all there is to say in terms of plot. These two meet up, talk a lot, spend time in Patricia’s bedroom, and eventually the law comes calling. The film is only about 90 minutes long, and sometimes it quickly shifts through events thanks the aforementioned jump cuts. Instead of lingering on the shooting that sets off the events in motion, the filmmakers quickly cut through it as though Godard is short for time. Reading about how the film was made I learned a lot of it was improvised, and it definitely seems as though some of the lines and the way they are delivered were unrehearsed. The film’s title thus seems to have more than one meaning.   

A lot could be written about the film’s style, its meaning in regards to French society, or the significance of its loose narrative structure, but I guess I am just not knowledgeable enough when it comes to cinema history to write about that. However I am enough of a film fan to see the influence of Breathless in the film’s of Quentin Tarantino, from the cool-looking criminals to the loose story structure. True Romance in particular, with its amateur criminal with a love of movies who goes on the run with the love of his life, seems to owe a lot to Godard.


Given its influence on modern day movies, I can appreciate Breathless’ place in cinema history, but it is not a movie I would enjoy watching repeatedly. That being said, I love the work of the directors it has inspired. If it wasn’t for Godard, we might not have Clarence and Alabama sporting cool sunglasses as they shoot their way to Los Angeles.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #70: Stand by Me

Another clear influence on Stranger Things, Rob Reiner’s Stand by Me (1986) portrays American kids from a lost era in which they could go on an adventure away from home. Nowadays if children go missing for more than an hour parents try to locate them using cell phone apps, but in the story written by Stephen King four boys in 1959 Oregon go walking in the woods during a long weekend to look for, of all things, a dead body. Their lives are sometimes at risk, they have no way of communicating with their parents, but they will definitely have a story to remember for the rest of their lives.
For many North Americans adults this movie fondly reminded them of a time in their childhood despite the inherent danger. Not so for me since, first of all, there was no time in my childhood when I could possibly go out of the house for more than three hours without my mom getting in her car to go look for me. The there is the fact that I spent a good chunk of my childhood living in Chile and Peru, an…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #77: Spartacus

Spartacus (1960) is an interesting movie in Stanley Kubrick's filmography because it doesn’t really feel like a Stanley Kubrick movie. I don’t exactly know why, but his signature style doesn’t seem to be present unlike in classics such as The Shining, A Clockwork Orange, or Dr. Strangelove. It does however feel like one of those big sword-and-sandals epics in which you have British thespians acting as Roman politicians with the occasional big battle sequence. In that respect it is spectacular and features Kirk Douglas at his best as the titular hero.
The story of the rebel slave Spartacus has inspired a bloody and sexy TV series (so far unseen by me, but I hear it’s great) and the story behind how it was made is one of those cases of life imitating art. The Bryan Cranston film Trumbo tells how screenwriter Dalton Trumbo was blacklisted in Hollywood during the 1950s for his communist beliefs and had to rebel against the system by writing screenplays for cheap movies under a fake nam…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #79: The Thin Red Line

I once saw an interview in which Christopher Plummer said that what Terrence Malick needs is a writer. He was referring to his experience shooting The New World, which saw his role considerably reduced. The same happened to a much greater extent with Malick’s war movie The Thin Red Line (1998), which saw the screen time of many movie stars reduced to mere minutes amid a 170-minute running time. However you have to hand it to the guy: he knows how to make anything look beautiful, including the carnage of war.
Malick’s movie came out the same year as Saving Private Ryan, so I think that year I had my fill of ultra violent war films and was no too interested in seeing it. Sixteen years later I finally caught up to it on Netflix, but in hindsight the big screen might have been a better option since this is a very visual story. The plot is pretty loose, following one American soldier and sometimes some of his brothers in arms as they make their way through World War II in the Pacific theat…