Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #128: Lost in Translation

Being in a country where you don’t speak the language and most people don’t speak your language is a rather unique experience, which Sofia Coppola perfectly captured in her comedy/drama Lost in Translation (2003). Setting the movie in Japan greatly increases the feeling of isolation the two main characters feel, since at times Japanese culture almost feels like something from another world when compared to western culture. Then again with Donald Trump running for President of the United States this year Japan is starting to look pretty tame as compared to how the world was in 2003.

I have not had the chance to travel to Japan, but I spent a good chunk of my teenage years in South America where I had to slowly learn Spanish for everyday use. While watching Lost in Translation I could somewhat identify with the situation of Bob Harris (Bill Murray), an American adrift in Tokyo. The first time you are in a country with a different culture, language, and time zone, there is a lot of adjustment to be made. You need help asking for directions, you need to learn how to ask for food, and sometimes you are not even sure if what you ordered is what you thought it was. What you think are tomatoes might actually be extremely spicy peppers, so dictionaries are always a must.

Murray’s character in Coppola’s film is not in Japan indefinitely, but he still adrift both culturally and in life. A middle-aged actor, Bob Harris is being paid a vast sum of money to shoot a whiskey commercial. This is actually a very plausible plot, since there are plenty of actors such as Tommy Lee Jones, Bruce Willis, and of course Nicolas Cage who have travelled to the land of the rising sun for that same reason. Just do a quick search on YouTube to find footage of Tommy Lee Jones shooting lasers out of his eyes for a coffee ad. It’s as weird as it sounds.

Bob however is not having a lot of fun with his shoot, no matter how much money he is making. He needs a translator to understand his director’s input, and he has the distinct feeling the translator is not telling him the whole story. He is not too eager to head back home, since his 25-year marriage and even his children are not bringing him much joy these days. The significant time difference between Japan and America keeps Bob awake at night, leading to an encounter with Charlotte (Scarlett Johansson) a fellow American experiencing similar problems.

Whereas Bob is well into his marriage and career, Charlotte is a college student unsure of what to do with her life, and recently married to John (Giovanni Ribisi) a photographer too busy to spend time with her while on assignment. Charlotte correctly diagnoses Bob is having a mid-life crisis, whereas Bob can tell she might end up in a similar situation one day and offers advise on marriage and children. When they are not discussing life, the universe, and everything the two decide to explore the city and Japanese culture, inevitably leading to a karaoke bar.

Someone once told me they thought not much happens in Lost in Translation, and that is fair up to a point. This is not Bill Murray chasing ghosts, and Johansson is not fighting robots while dressed in a leather suit. However anybody who has ever felt isolated or adrift in their lives will find a lot to identify with in Coppola’s story. This is also worth watching if only for another strong dramatic turn from Murray, who is portraying a flawed, charismatic, and lonely man adrift in the night.


As a woman in her 20s unsure of what the future holds for her, Johansson rises to Murray’s level and the two have great onscreen chemistry despite the obvious age difference. Then of course there is that final scene, where your first instinct is to raise the volume if you are watching the movie on TV because you think there is no way the audience wouldn’t be able to hear the parting words Bob whispers to Charlotte. It might be frustrating, but it was a wise choice on Coppola’s part since people have been speculating what those words are for the past 13 years.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #77: Spartacus

Spartacus (1960) is an interesting movie in Stanley Kubrick's filmography because it doesn’t really feel like a Stanley Kubrick movie. I don’t exactly know why, but his signature style doesn’t seem to be present unlike in classics such as The Shining, A Clockwork Orange, or Dr. Strangelove. It does however feel like one of those big sword-and-sandals epics in which you have British thespians acting as Roman politicians with the occasional big battle sequence. In that respect it is spectacular and features Kirk Douglas at his best as the titular hero.
The story of the rebel slave Spartacus has inspired a bloody and sexy TV series (so far unseen by me, but I hear it’s great) and the story behind how it was made is one of those cases of life imitating art. The Bryan Cranston film Trumbo tells how screenwriter Dalton Trumbo was blacklisted in Hollywood during the 1950s for his communist beliefs and had to rebel against the system by writing screenplays for cheap movies under a fake nam…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #79: The Thin Red Line

I once saw an interview in which Christopher Plummer said that what Terrence Malick needs is a writer. He was referring to his experience shooting The New World, which saw his role considerably reduced. The same happened to a much greater extent with Malick’s war movie The Thin Red Line (1998), which saw the screen time of many movie stars reduced to mere minutes amid a 170-minute running time. However you have to hand it to the guy: he knows how to make anything look beautiful, including the carnage of war.
Malick’s movie came out the same year as Saving Private Ryan, so I think that year I had my fill of ultra violent war films and was no too interested in seeing it. Sixteen years later I finally caught up to it on Netflix, but in hindsight the big screen might have been a better option since this is a very visual story. The plot is pretty loose, following one American soldier and sometimes some of his brothers in arms as they make their way through World War II in the Pacific theat…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence.
My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks. This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a love for …