Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #151: Gladiator

The words “a Ridley Scott film” can mean a lot of things: a science-fiction film, a thriller, or a straight-up drama. One genre in which he seems to be quite at ease is the swords and sandals epic, and his most successful entry in that genre has been his Oscar-winning Gladiator (2000) with his frequent collaborator Russell Crowe. The story is filled with representations of corruption in politics, how entertainment can be used to distract or win the masses, but mostly it is remembered for the fights on the sand of the arena. This is best encompassed by the hero’s signature scream to the audience: “Are you not entertained?”

Most people watching this movie for the first time might probably link it to other similar epics, but the first thing that popped into my mind and the mind of my parents and brother when we first watched it was, “this sounds an awful lot like the French comic book Astérix.” The opening describes how at this point in history the Roman Empire has vanquished all of its enemies except for a rebellious Germanic tribe. If you have read Astérix, you would understand why we half expected a short moustachioed warrior and his big buddy Obélix to defeat the entire Roman army with their fists. That would have been fun, but it is not quite the tone Scott was going for.

Instead we get Russell Crowe as General Maximus Meridius successfully defeating the Germanic tribe thanks to skills, organizations, and a lot of arrows in a bloody and muddy battlefield. Despite the exhaustive battle, Maximus has the respect and loyalty of his soldiers, while Maximus gives his loyalty to the emperor Marcus Aurelius (the late great Richard Harris). The emperor loves his general like a son, which is a major slap in the face of his actual son Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix) who of course has his eyes on the throne. The battlefield is one thing, but politics is twice as dangerous because there your enemies hide in the shadows

In a true Shakespearean twist, Commodus decides to murder his father after he learns he has offered Maximus the job of emperor in order to reign in the corruption in Rome. The film is remembered for Russell Crowe’s performance, but Joaquin Phoenix is equally great as Commodus and gives a much more nuanced performance. In the scene when the emperor tells him he is not to inherit the throne he seems genuinely hurt and sad, even when he proceeds to choke the life out of his father. Connie Nielsen, who plays Commodus’ sister Lucilla, also has a meaty role since from the moment of her father’s death she is stuck in a life or death situation. She embraces her brother knowing full well what he is what he has done, but only because she also knows what he would do to her son should she get out of line.

Before all the political backstabbing and plotting in Rome takes place, we get to see Maximus go from respected general to slave after Commodus orders his death and that of his family. Captured and sold to Proximo (Oliver Reed, who died during production) a gladiator trainer, Maximus has lost his faith in his gods and his will to live. That is until he learns a gladiator can win his freedom through fame and by being the last man standing in the glorious coliseum in Rome, where the emperor would meet him in person. Freedom sounds nice, but stabbing Commodus on the sands of the arena sounds even better. Maximus’ advantage over the other gladiators is his army training, which allows his to defeat the largest of opponents while rich people are watching him over food and drinks. Now that’s entertainment.


Like many historical films, Gladiator has been criticised for its inaccuracy, and I remember reading somewhere it holds some sort of record for having the most movie mistakes, such as actors still wearing their watches during production. That may be, but once when I see Russell Crowe charging into battle while Hans Zimmer’s heroic theme is playing I am not really thinking about history, I am just thinking this is pretty badass. I will look for historical accuracy in the history books, in the movies I just want to be entertained.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #70: Stand by Me

Another clear influence on Stranger Things, Rob Reiner’s Stand by Me (1986) portrays American kids from a lost era in which they could go on an adventure away from home. Nowadays if children go missing for more than an hour parents try to locate them using cell phone apps, but in the story written by Stephen King four boys in 1959 Oregon go walking in the woods during a long weekend to look for, of all things, a dead body. Their lives are sometimes at risk, they have no way of communicating with their parents, but they will definitely have a story to remember for the rest of their lives.
For many North Americans adults this movie fondly reminded them of a time in their childhood despite the inherent danger. Not so for me since, first of all, there was no time in my childhood when I could possibly go out of the house for more than three hours without my mom getting in her car to go look for me. The there is the fact that I spent a good chunk of my childhood living in Chile and Peru, an…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #77: Spartacus

Spartacus (1960) is an interesting movie in Stanley Kubrick's filmography because it doesn’t really feel like a Stanley Kubrick movie. I don’t exactly know why, but his signature style doesn’t seem to be present unlike in classics such as The Shining, A Clockwork Orange, or Dr. Strangelove. It does however feel like one of those big sword-and-sandals epics in which you have British thespians acting as Roman politicians with the occasional big battle sequence. In that respect it is spectacular and features Kirk Douglas at his best as the titular hero.
The story of the rebel slave Spartacus has inspired a bloody and sexy TV series (so far unseen by me, but I hear it’s great) and the story behind how it was made is one of those cases of life imitating art. The Bryan Cranston film Trumbo tells how screenwriter Dalton Trumbo was blacklisted in Hollywood during the 1950s for his communist beliefs and had to rebel against the system by writing screenplays for cheap movies under a fake nam…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #79: The Thin Red Line

I once saw an interview in which Christopher Plummer said that what Terrence Malick needs is a writer. He was referring to his experience shooting The New World, which saw his role considerably reduced. The same happened to a much greater extent with Malick’s war movie The Thin Red Line (1998), which saw the screen time of many movie stars reduced to mere minutes amid a 170-minute running time. However you have to hand it to the guy: he knows how to make anything look beautiful, including the carnage of war.
Malick’s movie came out the same year as Saving Private Ryan, so I think that year I had my fill of ultra violent war films and was no too interested in seeing it. Sixteen years later I finally caught up to it on Netflix, but in hindsight the big screen might have been a better option since this is a very visual story. The plot is pretty loose, following one American soldier and sometimes some of his brothers in arms as they make their way through World War II in the Pacific theat…