Skip to main content

Empire Magazine Greatest Movies List - #281: Interview with the Vampire

When it comes to movie monsters, vampires go in and out of fashion with mixed results: sometimes you get a great retelling of Dracula, sometimes you get Twilight. In between, you get the work of Anne Rice, whose Vampire Chronicles has not had the same success on the big screen as Stephanie Myers’ books, but her first entry is one of the best exploration of what it must be like to be a vampire. Interview with the Vampire (1994) features the life and times of two vampires, one a complete sociopath who sees humans as cattle, and the other a man with guilt over the people he has destroyed. In a brilliant casting stroke, they are played by two of the biggest movie stars in the world.

If you are behind on your horror movie watching, October is a great month because all the movie channels play the old classics, or just the successful ones. So during a holiday from the university while staying in Quebec City, I saw Neil Jordan’s adaptation of Interview with the Vampire on MPix and was glad to see something to counteract the whole Twilight craze that was all over the place at the time. Here are some of my favourite vampire tales: John Carpenter’s Vampires, The Strain by Guillermo Del Toro, Blade II by Del Toro again, and Dracula by Francis Ford Coppola. If the vampires are heinous monsters that can only be stopped by being stabbed, shot, dismembered or burned in the sun, count me in.

Interview with the Vampire is narrated by vampire Louis de Pointe du Lac (Brad Pitt) who has decided to tell his life story to fascinated San Francisco reporter Daniel Malloy (Christian Slater). Back in 1791 Louis was living in misery in his Louisiana mansion following the death of his wife and child. He craved death, but instead Lestat de Lioncourt (Tom Cruise) gave him something else. After drinking each Lestat’s blood, Louis became immortal and developed a thirst for other people’s blood. He tried to control it at first, feeding on livestock, but eventually caved in and killed a house slave. After trying to kill himself by setting his house on fire, Louis flees with Lestat into the night.

While living in New Orleans, Lestat gives Louis a gift of sort by turning Claudia (a young Kirsten Dunst), whose mother died from a plague. Together the three of them form an odd family. Claudia never grows old and her “fathers” have to teach her not to suck the blood out of her tailor, or at least not until after he has finished his job. Yet after thirty years, amidst all the killings she does to stay alive, Claudia begins to feel cursed rather than gifted. Realizing she will never grow old like normal people, she blames Lestat for transforming her. Together with Louis she hatches a plan to leave him for dead, but this guy is harder to kill than the Terminator.

The third act unfolds in 1870s Paris, where Louis wishes to find information about the origin of vampires and to find out if him and Claudia are the only ones left. He finds some answers with two European vampires, Armand (Antonio Banderas) and Santiago (Stephen Rea). Their coven is a theatre troupe whose members suck the life out of a young girl in front of an unsuspecting audience. Vampires pretending to be humans who are pretending to be vampires: it’s so clever it actually works. Unfortunately for Louis, vampires can read each other’s minds and once they find out about his attempt on Lestat's life they are none too thrilled. He may have crossed the Atlantic only to find more trouble.

Blood flows aplenty throughout the movie and the set designs and cinematography are all works of art, especially when Louis attacks the Parisian vampires in their crypt. The movie’s greatest triumph though is conveying how time must weigh on a vampire. For Lestat, this is all fun and games, but at the dawn of the 21st century Louis feels alone and isolated. It took the invention of the cinema for him to finally see a sunrise after 200 years, but when he goes to the theatre he is alone.

Rice seems to be saying that if vampires actually did exist like in they do in the movies they would be just like everybody else. In real life there are complete monsters that can kill without remorse like Lestat, and decent people like Louis who sees the horror of his actions. Just because you are a monster it doesn’t mean you have to act like one. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #316: Trainspotting

In the 1990s Hollywood directors were the kings of cinema, whether it was for big summer blockbusters or smaller independent films. Guys like James Cameron or Michael Bay would blow up the screens while Kevin Smith and Quentin Tarantino put the emphasis on snappy dialogue that created relatable characters for the moviegoers. Then in 1996, as if to scream “we can do this too,” Danny Boyle released Trainspotting in the United Kingdom.
Based on a novel by Scottish novelist Irvine Welsh, the movie took the world by storm despite having no explosions, a cast of actors who were relatively unknown and a budget that today could barely pay for the catering of a Transformers movie. Furthermore this is not the story of young people going to college to enter a life full of promise, but about young heroine addicts meandering through the streets of Edinburgh. Despite introducing these characters during an energetic montage set to Iggy Pop’s Lust for Life, Danny Boyle and screenwriter John Hodge in …

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #364: Natural Born Killers

Natural Born Killers (1994) is not so much a movie as an American nightmare come to life. Loosely based on a story by Quentin Tarantino, starring some of the wildest actors in Hollywood at the time, and boasting a level of violence that unfortunately inspired copycat crimes, it is the textbook definition of controversial. In all fairness there are important messages amidst all the violent mayhem, but director Oliver Stone throws so much content at the screen that these messages can sometimes get lost in the carnage.
Even though the movie came out more than two decades ago it still has a legendary status, which I learned about while reading a chapter in a book about Tarantino’s career. The book, Quintessential Tarantino, contained a lot of interesting facts about the making of the movie and also spoiled the ending, but reading a few words that describe a killing spree is very different than seeing it portrayed on screen. A few years ago the director’s cut became available on Netflix, wh…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #64: Oldboy

One thing I have noticed from the few Korean films I have seen so far is that Korean cinema really doesn’t hold back. One of that country’s most critically acclaimed and commercially successful movie is Oldboy (2003), which has amazing performances, beautifully choreographed fight scenes and a story filled with many twists and turns. It also has plenty of scenes that will make you squirm whether because of graphic violence, very disturbing revelation, or because you prefer your calamari fried instead of alive.
This was one of the last movies I rented from a video store in the pre-Netflix days in early 2009. By then its reputation had grown in the west especially since on top of the many awards it had won it had also earned high praise from Quentin Tarantino who knows a thing or two about violent and entertaining movies. On paper Oldboy’s plot sounds like something right up his alley: a man is seemingly wronged by an adversary and that man then seeks bloody retribution. However while T…