Skip to main content

Empire Magazine Greatest Movies List - #325: Kill Bill Vol. 1


Quentin Tarantino has, so far, made fewer movies than I have fingers. Yet his films are so distinctively stylistic that every time a new one comes out everyone from the Cannes Film Festival to the Academy Awards pays attention. This explains why when the first trailer for “Kill Bill” came out it proudly said “Miramax presents the 4th film by Quentin Tarantino” as though it was the announcement of a major event. Given the sight of Uma Thurman surrounded by sword-wielding henchmen to the tune of yet another great Tarantino soundtrack, it did indeed look like an affair to remember. When that first trailer came out, Miramax had not yet announced their decision to split the film in two. Given the full film’s four-hour running time, it did make logical and not just financial sense. The man does like to write a lot of scenes, but whether they involve blood flow or word flow, they are always excellent scenes.

This film came out in October 2003, a few months after my family and I had moved back to Québec City after an 8-year stint in South America, and two months after I had turned eighteen. So two things: number one, I was finally able to see American movies the month they were released in America and not four months later, and number two, I could walk into a theatre and watch whatever I wanted. Not that had stopped me from watching “Reservoir Dogs” or “Pulp Fiction” beforehand, but it was great to walk into a movie theatre with my older brother to see a film filled with bloody carnage and lines like “I collect your fucking head.”

As with many Tarantino films, “Kill Bill” is a tale of revenge featuring one tough leading lady. Uma Thurman plays an assassin who goes by many names; but mostly goes by The Bride since she was gunned down on the day of her wedding along with her fiancé and all her friends. Bill (David Carradine), her former employer did not take kindly to her leaving his organization and so he ordered the rest of the DIVAS (Deadly Viper Assassination Squad) to walk into her church and shoot everyone dead, despite the fact she was clearly pregnant at the time. Yet as fan favourite Sheriff Earl McGraw (Michael Parks) notices when examining her body, she is not quite dead yet.

Four years later The Bride awakens from a coma and is understandably upset upon realizing she has a metal plate in her head and no baby in her belly. After escaping the hospital and stealing a pickup truck with the world’s least inconspicuous name (Pussy Wagon!), she begins to plan her revenge. She makes a list of the people involved in the massacre and leaves Bill for last. A simple plot, but the way this plot unfolds is as usual uniquely Tarantinoesque.

The story does have a clear beginning, middle and end, but the structure is fractured. We first see The Bride going after assassin Vernita Green (Vivica A. Fox), yet the list shows she is second on the list, and number one has already been crossed off. The fight between the two happens after an even bigger battle in Japan, but all movies are rarely shot chronologically, so maybe Tarantino is reminding the audience this is just a movie.

In fact the film is filled with touches that highlight the fact this is nowhere near a place we call real life. When The Bride’s real name is mentioned, it is bleeped out for the simple reason of preserving the mystery of her identity for as long as possible. During the ultra violent battle between The Bride and the army of henchmen fighting for assassin O-Ren Ishi (Lucy Liu) so much blood is spilled the screen suddenly turns to black and white. During flashback scenes that tell O-Ren’s violent origin story, Japanese anime is used to show her traumatic childhood and rise to crime boss of Japan. I think this is Tarantino saying “this is violent, but fun violence. Enjoy.” Will do sir.

Yet in the middle of all the severed limbs, there is a message here. After killing Vernita, The Bride notices the assassin’s 4-year-old daughter was standing in the doorway. Before leaving she tells the girl if she still feel bad about it when she grows up, The Bride will be waiting. This highlights the problem with killing for revenge: as long as the person getting killed has friends or family, the conflict could go on forever. The Bride wronged Bill, so he had her shot. The Bride wakes up and kills Bill’s assassins. These people could know people who will want to avenge their death and could go after her later (Kill Bill Vol. 3?). Maybe this whole cycle of death could be avoided if these maniacs would do the smart thing and not pick up a weapon in the first place.

The film’s violent content was certainly shocking the first time around, and after seeing it in theatres my brother assumed I wouldn’t want to see Volume 2. He assumed wrong. Maybe a couple of years before I would have been taken aback by the violence, but by the time this first Volume came out I was in fact desensitized by the violence. I went from being scared of the bloody scenes in the end of “Raiders of the Lost Ark” to enjoying the sight of a man being decapitated and blood flowing out of his head like a fountain. It felt great to be eighteen.  

    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #70: Stand by Me

Another clear influence on Stranger Things, Rob Reiner’s Stand by Me (1986) portrays American kids from a lost era in which they could go on an adventure away from home. Nowadays if children go missing for more than an hour parents try to locate them using cell phone apps, but in the story written by Stephen King four boys in 1959 Oregon go walking in the woods during a long weekend to look for, of all things, a dead body. Their lives are sometimes at risk, they have no way of communicating with their parents, but they will definitely have a story to remember for the rest of their lives.
For many North Americans adults this movie fondly reminded them of a time in their childhood despite the inherent danger. Not so for me since, first of all, there was no time in my childhood when I could possibly go out of the house for more than three hours without my mom getting in her car to go look for me. The there is the fact that I spent a good chunk of my childhood living in Chile and Peru, an…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #77: Spartacus

Spartacus (1960) is an interesting movie in Stanley Kubrick's filmography because it doesn’t really feel like a Stanley Kubrick movie. I don’t exactly know why, but his signature style doesn’t seem to be present unlike in classics such as The Shining, A Clockwork Orange, or Dr. Strangelove. It does however feel like one of those big sword-and-sandals epics in which you have British thespians acting as Roman politicians with the occasional big battle sequence. In that respect it is spectacular and features Kirk Douglas at his best as the titular hero.
The story of the rebel slave Spartacus has inspired a bloody and sexy TV series (so far unseen by me, but I hear it’s great) and the story behind how it was made is one of those cases of life imitating art. The Bryan Cranston film Trumbo tells how screenwriter Dalton Trumbo was blacklisted in Hollywood during the 1950s for his communist beliefs and had to rebel against the system by writing screenplays for cheap movies under a fake nam…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #79: The Thin Red Line

I once saw an interview in which Christopher Plummer said that what Terrence Malick needs is a writer. He was referring to his experience shooting The New World, which saw his role considerably reduced. The same happened to a much greater extent with Malick’s war movie The Thin Red Line (1998), which saw the screen time of many movie stars reduced to mere minutes amid a 170-minute running time. However you have to hand it to the guy: he knows how to make anything look beautiful, including the carnage of war.
Malick’s movie came out the same year as Saving Private Ryan, so I think that year I had my fill of ultra violent war films and was no too interested in seeing it. Sixteen years later I finally caught up to it on Netflix, but in hindsight the big screen might have been a better option since this is a very visual story. The plot is pretty loose, following one American soldier and sometimes some of his brothers in arms as they make their way through World War II in the Pacific theat…