Skip to main content

Empire Magazine Greatest Movies List - #372: Army of Darkness


I imagine sometimes it must be great to be Bruce Campbell. Sure, the man has made so many cheesy fantasy movies he ended parodying himself in “My Name is Bruce,” but in the late 80s and early 90s he starred in one of the funniest horror comedy series of all times: The Evil Dead. The first “Evil Dead” was a straight horror film that told the old story of kids being haunted in a cabin in the woods. “Evil Dead II” essentially remade the first movie but with a healthy injection of humor and upgrading Campbell to full-fledged action hero equipped with a chainsaw. “Army of Darkness” closes the loop with a bigger budget as Campbell now finds himself stuck in the Middle Ages with his BOOM STICK!

I actually watched the entire trilogy in reverse, starting with “Army on Darkness” when it was playing on the ScyFy channel (of course), then “Evil Dead II” at the film club I attended at the University of Sherbrooke and then renting the first “Evil Dead” at the video store. As with most trilogies the second entry is the best, but “Army of Darkness” works very well as a stand-alone fantasy film. This isn’t the first time a character ends up thrown in the past, but if that character is Bruce Campbell, it’s going to be a fun ride. Come to think of it, this was the first movie I saw starring the author of “If Chins could kill: Confessions of a B Movie Actor.” After seeing this, I knew I would enjoy a movie with a title like “Bubba Ho-Tep” if it starred Campbell as Elvis Presley fighting a mummy in a retirement home. 

Picking up exactly where “Evil Dead II” left off, we find Campbell’s character Ash stuck in Medieval England after reading from a cursed book. He finds himself the prisoner of Lord Arthur (Marcus Gilbert) who suspects him of being an agent of his enemy Duke Henry (Richard Grove). Once in Arthur’s castle, Ash is thrown into a pit to be killed by a hideous demon. It is not long before Ash regains his weapons of choice: a chainsaw and a sawed-off shotgun. After defeating the demon and impressing the locals with his “magic” Ash demands the castle’s Wise Man (Ian Abercrombie) sends him back to his timeline.

The Wise Man tells him to do this he must find the cursed book that sent him to the past in the first place: the Necronomicon. I wonder, is that a real book or did writer and director Sam Raimi found it while perusing comic books? Either way, that does sound like the name of a book that could raise the dead. Once Ash gets his hands on the book, all he has to do is say three magic words and he will be sent back in time. Simple, except he messes up the last word and instead raises an undead army that lays siege to Arthur’s castle. See this is why you should always pronounce your words carefully.

What follows is a battle between an army of demons and skeletons against Arthur’s knights aided by Ash and his chemistry books he conveniently brought with him in his 1973 Oldsmobile Delta 88. This is where Raimi makes good use of his increased budget, but the joy of the film comes from watching Campbell fighting all sorts of demons as though he was one of the Three Stooges. In fact, a pair of skeletal fingers even tries to poke his eyes. Then there is that swagger. Despite being catapulted centuries into the past, Ash still makes time tries to make out with Sheila, one of the castle’s maidens, with lines like “give me some sugar baby.”

The movie was a minor hit in 1993, but of course like the previous films it gained a cult following. Several official/unofficial sequels were made to the series in the form of video games, comic books and even a musical. This may not be high art, but it is undeniably entertaining. Plus, find me a better definition of escapism. An average man is whisked away to a far away place, saves the girl, beats the bad guys, while handling a chainsaw and saying “Hail to the king baby!”  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #102: The Hustler

Robert Rossen’s The Hustler (1961) is proof that any sport can be used for good cinematic drama even if that sport is pool. Although this is not a game that involves a massive sport arena and bloody boxing gloves, things can get dramatically interesting if the monetary stakes are high, and visually arresting if the filmmakers shoot from the right angle. It also helps a lot if the man putting his money on the table is played by a young Paul Newman in a career-breaking role. Prior to watching the film I had a vague idea of the meaning of the word “hustling” and a rather passive interest in the game of pool. It’s a fun game to play if you are having a couple of nachos and chicken wings on a Friday evening with friends, but I didn’t see it as a spectator sport. Watching The Hustler in the classics section of Netflix two years ago was a bit of an education since it shows the sport as a way of life for some people, and a huge source of revenue for big time gamblers. Newman star as...