Skip to main content

Empire List #469: Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas

Here’s a semi-interesting fact: I spent approximately eight years in South America, four of them in Peru, and I never did any drugs. No one at any of my schools ever offered me any and I know for a fact know somebody had some because in Peru sniffer dogs were once brought in and lockers were searched. This may sound lame to some people, but in my lunchbox all I had was…well, my lunch. No weed, no blow, not even a cigarette. The only drug-related experience I have ever had is watching drug-related movies such as “Traffic,” “Easy Rider,” “Blow,” “The Big Lebowski.” and “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.”

I found “Fear and Loathing…” at a video store in Sherbrooke while I was studying English at the Universite de Sherbrooke (no drugs there either). Not much of a video store, since you could see the evolution of home entertainment as you walked down the aisles. They had Blu-rays, DVDs…and VHS tapes…in 2007. Seriously, time to go with the flow and dump the old tapes. But you had to hand it to the management, they had a wide variety of movies, including the criterion release of “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” directed by Terry Gilliam, he of Monty Python fame. I had heard of this particular film for years since it has attained a cult status. I was curious to know why so I rented it immediately with the intention of watching it that night on my laptop.

I believe the very first words uttered by Johnny Depp as journalist Raoul Duke are “We were right around Barstow when the drugs started to take effect.” That pretty much sets the tone for the entire movie right there. Duke and his associate, Dr. Gonzo (Benicio Del Toro) are in a convertible headed for Las Vegas to cover a motorcycle race. Not that their reason for going to Vegas really matters since they spend most of their stay stoned out of their minds. I believe the story is set in 1970s, so of course they drop acid, but also mescaline, ether, and some stuff that was experimental. As mentioned, I’ve never been on a drug trip, but if any of the drug-induced sequences in this movie are accurate, I am not too tempted to go on one.

Terry Gilliam is a director with a knack for visually creative sequences, so when Duke and Gonzo start using, the viewer gets to see some mighty interesting things happen on-screen. When they check into their first hotel, Duke hallucinates that the carpet is moving and that some of the patrons are hideous lizards. That’s just the first hotel. At another one Gonzo offers Duke some of the experimental stuff, after which Duke is convinced Gonzo is turning into a hairy creature with breasts on its back. It’s a miracle these two didn’t end up jumping off a balcony thinking they were being chased by an rhinoceros wielding a chainsaw. Although one drug trip is rather amusing as it involves Duke having a flashback to a dance club and seeing himself, or rather Johnny Depp sees Hunter S. Thompson, the journalist on whom Duke is based on.

Johnny Depp has got to be one of the few actors in the world who can immerse himself into such a character. He has played everything from Ed Wood to Willie Wonka. He can play gangsters, cops, pirates, murderers, and just about everything in between. Kudos to Benicio del Toro as well for being almost unrecognisable as Dr. Gonzo, the overweight Samoan lawyer who is the last person in the world who should offer legal advice to anyone, much less a drug-addled journalist in Las Vegas.

Despite having no coherent plot, this movie is a fun trip, and not just for the visuals. Apart from the excellent two leads, some notable actors cameo in the film, such as Tobey Maguire before his “Spider-Man” days as a hitchhiker, and Gary Busey, an actor who, rumour has it, also did his fair share of drugs, as a cop pulling Duke over in the middle of the desert. Then there is Christina Ricci as Lucy, a girl who came to Vegas to meet Barbara Streisand, but is fed LSD by Gonzo and taken to his room. Seeing that Lucy is most likely under age, this is where Duke believes they have crossed the line and should probably back away from this particular situation. Wise move.

It’s a shame that this movie bombed at the box-office when it was first released, but I sort of understand why given its incoherent plot and bizarre images. This is also most likely also why it became a cult classic, like most of Terry Gilliam’s films. I should be thankful since he did me a favour: I don’t need to do drugs to have a wild trip; I just need to watch this movie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #77: Spartacus

Spartacus (1960) is an interesting movie in Stanley Kubrick's filmography because it doesn’t really feel like a Stanley Kubrick movie. I don’t exactly know why, but his signature style doesn’t seem to be present unlike in classics such as The Shining, A Clockwork Orange, or Dr. Strangelove. It does however feel like one of those big sword-and-sandals epics in which you have British thespians acting as Roman politicians with the occasional big battle sequence. In that respect it is spectacular and features Kirk Douglas at his best as the titular hero.
The story of the rebel slave Spartacus has inspired a bloody and sexy TV series (so far unseen by me, but I hear it’s great) and the story behind how it was made is one of those cases of life imitating art. The Bryan Cranston film Trumbo tells how screenwriter Dalton Trumbo was blacklisted in Hollywood during the 1950s for his communist beliefs and had to rebel against the system by writing screenplays for cheap movies under a fake nam…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #79: The Thin Red Line

I once saw an interview in which Christopher Plummer said that what Terrence Malick needs is a writer. He was referring to his experience shooting The New World, which saw his role considerably reduced. The same happened to a much greater extent with Malick’s war movie The Thin Red Line (1998), which saw the screen time of many movie stars reduced to mere minutes amid a 170-minute running time. However you have to hand it to the guy: he knows how to make anything look beautiful, including the carnage of war.
Malick’s movie came out the same year as Saving Private Ryan, so I think that year I had my fill of ultra violent war films and was no too interested in seeing it. Sixteen years later I finally caught up to it on Netflix, but in hindsight the big screen might have been a better option since this is a very visual story. The plot is pretty loose, following one American soldier and sometimes some of his brothers in arms as they make their way through World War II in the Pacific theat…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence.
My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks. This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a love for …