Skip to main content

Empire List #486: Breakfast at Tiffany's

The great thing about a TV channel where they only show movies 24/7 is that eventually, you just might run into a classic. I do not currently even own a TV, but fortunately during the fall of 2009 I was spending my week off at my mother’s place in Quebec City where she does have the Movie Network. This allowed me to watch “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” a classic from 1961.

I didn’t know much about this movie except that it stars Audrey Hepburn, a giant of the screen in her days. I was familiar with the work of the director, Blake Edwards and his composer Henry Mancini. If you haven’t seen the original “Pink Panther” films, which are ten times better than the remakes, then you definitely must have heard its iconic theme at some point. With talent like that in front of and behind the screen I felt pretty confident this was a film worth watching.

Audrey Hepburn plays Holly Golightly, a firecracker of a character who owns every room she walks into. Her name sounds like that of a Bond girl from that era, when they were damsels in distress to be rescued by Sean Connery. It turns out to be a fake name since Holly is sort of a high-class call girl living in New York. Part of her weekly routine involves visiting Sally Tomato, an incarcerated mob boss who pays her $100 just for a one-hour conversation. It doesn’t hurt that she also carries messages for Sally’s drug ring.

The movie’s plot revolves around Holly slowly developing a romance with Paul Varjak (George Peppard) a new tenant in her building. Paul is a writer who hasn’t published anything in years and is about to get his creative juices flowing by meeting Holly.

There are many funny moments in the film. As a popular New York socialite, Holly invites dozens of people to her apartment. After a few too many cocktails, these wealthy characters start to really let loose. When a woman is about to drop to the floor inebriated, Holly yells “TIMBER” like a lumberjack who has just cut down a tree.

The constant going-ons in her apartment cause the ire of Holly’s Japanese landlord Mr. Yunioshi, a stereotypical character if there ever was one. Played by Mickey Rooney, who clearly is not Japanese, Yunioshi is constantly angry, wears round glasses, and has one thick accent that is played for laughs. It’s difficult to tell what is more offensive for Japanese viewers: the fact that the character is a joke, or that he is played by a Caucasian man. You would think that decades later Hollywood would have learned from mistakes like these, but 2010 was the year when people wanted to boycott M. Night Shyamalan’s “The Last Airbender” because he cast Caucasian actors in what was meant to be Asian roles.

But back to the film at hand. A great story involves conflict and the greatest conflict with this particular story involves the obstacles standing between Holly and Paul. Holly likes Paul, but she means to use her socialite status to get close to wealthy men with the hopes of possibly marrying one and running off into the sunset. Paul doesn’t care about money; he only cares about being with Holly and is upset by her obsession with money. But it isn’t just about her. She also has a brother to support, and since her socialite status is the only way she can think of to make money, marrying a rich man seems like the best solution to all of her problems.

Will Holly and Paul get together in the end? Well let’s put it this way: this isn’t “Casablanca.”

You can tell a movie is a classic when it influences pop culture. I like the CSI franchise and during one episode of CSI: New York three young women rob a store dressed as Holly Golightly. Not the most inconspicuous of disguises to commit a robbery but you have to admire the idea that even thieves in New York love classic movies from the 1960s.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #70: Stand by Me

Another clear influence on Stranger Things, Rob Reiner’s Stand by Me (1986) portrays American kids from a lost era in which they could go on an adventure away from home. Nowadays if children go missing for more than an hour parents try to locate them using cell phone apps, but in the story written by Stephen King four boys in 1959 Oregon go walking in the woods during a long weekend to look for, of all things, a dead body. Their lives are sometimes at risk, they have no way of communicating with their parents, but they will definitely have a story to remember for the rest of their lives.
For many North Americans adults this movie fondly reminded them of a time in their childhood despite the inherent danger. Not so for me since, first of all, there was no time in my childhood when I could possibly go out of the house for more than three hours without my mom getting in her car to go look for me. The there is the fact that I spent a good chunk of my childhood living in Chile and Peru, an…

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #316: Trainspotting

In the 1990s Hollywood directors were the kings of cinema, whether it was for big summer blockbusters or smaller independent films. Guys like James Cameron or Michael Bay would blow up the screens while Kevin Smith and Quentin Tarantino put the emphasis on snappy dialogue that created relatable characters for the moviegoers. Then in 1996, as if to scream “we can do this too,” Danny Boyle released Trainspotting in the United Kingdom.
Based on a novel by Scottish novelist Irvine Welsh, the movie took the world by storm despite having no explosions, a cast of actors who were relatively unknown and a budget that today could barely pay for the catering of a Transformers movie. Furthermore this is not the story of young people going to college to enter a life full of promise, but about young heroine addicts meandering through the streets of Edinburgh. Despite introducing these characters during an energetic montage set to Iggy Pop’s Lust for Life, Danny Boyle and screenwriter John Hodge in …

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #364: Natural Born Killers

Natural Born Killers (1994) is not so much a movie as an American nightmare come to life. Loosely based on a story by Quentin Tarantino, starring some of the wildest actors in Hollywood at the time, and boasting a level of violence that unfortunately inspired copycat crimes, it is the textbook definition of controversial. In all fairness there are important messages amidst all the violent mayhem, but director Oliver Stone throws so much content at the screen that these messages can sometimes get lost in the carnage.
Even though the movie came out more than two decades ago it still has a legendary status, which I learned about while reading a chapter in a book about Tarantino’s career. The book, Quintessential Tarantino, contained a lot of interesting facts about the making of the movie and also spoiled the ending, but reading a few words that describe a killing spree is very different than seeing it portrayed on screen. A few years ago the director’s cut became available on Netflix, wh…