Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #139: Blow Out



Brian De Palma’s Blow Out (1981) manages to be an outstanding thriller while also educating the audience about the mechanics of making such a movie. Many moviegoers might not understand the concept of editing, sound mixing, or why they have their own categories at the Oscars. Through the eyes (and ears) of a sound technician, we get to see how every sound in any movie is carefully picked in order to elicit the right reaction from the audience. Things take a tragic turn when said technician records an actual murder.

Jack Terry (John Travolta) is a self-described “sound guy” who has quite a few movies under his belt. Unfortunately, those movies are not Oscar-winning dramas shot in Hollywood, but low-budget slasher films that border on sexploitation. Yet Jack works diligently out of his Philadelphia office, always trying to find the right sound to mix into the film. Those sounds can be anything from the sounds of a creaking door to the scream of an actress as a maniac is about to stab her. If the actress doesn’t sound scared, other actresses need to be brought to record a proper scream, which is then mixed in the audio track for the film. This, as they say, is how the sausage is made.

To make sure he has a full bank of various sounds, Jack sometimes goes out at night to record sounds of nature in a park. With a high-powered microphone he can record the wind in the trees, a croaking frog, or a couple out for a stroll. What he did not expect to record is the sound of a car crashing into the river right after one of its tires blows out. Ever the good Samaritan, he jumps in the river and pulls out a young woman (Nancy Allen) while the driver goes down with the car having died on impact.

Things start to get murkier at the hospital where Jack learns the driver was a promising politician that was on his way to becoming the next president. He was also a married man, which is why the politician’s friends ask Jack to keep quiet about the young woman, a makeup artist named Sally, who was in the car. However, after Jack hears what he believes to be a gunshot on his recording he decides to keep digging for the truth and pressures Sally to tell him why she in the car in the first place. His sound, combined with images taken by a conveniently placed photographer (Dennis Franz) at the scene, indicates there might a conspiracy afoot. Having previously worked in law enforcement by putting microphones on undercover cops, Jack feels the need to the right thing and uncover the conspiracy.

The problem with conspiracies is of course proving them. Nowadays everything from 5G network to Bill Gates putting microchips in COVID vaccines is deemed a conspiracy. This means if you do uncover a real conspiracy, odds are you will be first regarded as paranoid instead of a whistleblower. When Jack comes to the police with his footage, an exasperated cop asks, “Why does everything have to be a conspiracy?”

Another problem is the question of what constitutes hard evidence. Even though this movie is set decades before technology like Photoshop and Deep Fake, Jack eventually begins to realize his footage is not worth much. Even if were to release it to the one reporter who is interested in his story, anyone could accuse him of faking every sound. It is what Jack does for a living after all.

Then again, sometimes just because you are being paranoid it doesn’t mean someone is not after you. In Jack and Sally’s case, that someone is Burke (a very menacing John Lithgow), a fixer tying up loose ends by any means necessary. Part of his plan includes brutally murdering women who look like Sally, so that when he does kill her it will look like she was the victim of sex maniac. That seems a pretty overelaborate plan to get rid of one person, so Burke is probably not pretending to be a maniac. It is scenes when that monster is hunting his next victims that De Palma’s skills as a filmmaker really shine. Scenes are shot from Burke’s point and view as he hunts his victims, and there is a terrific sequence in which Jack is desperately trying to find his location based on sounds he is hearing on a microphone hidden on Sally.

I found the very ending of Blow Out to be a tad morbid, albeit darkly poetic, but everything before is superb. Here is a movie that gives you a bit of an education on the filmmaking process, makes you think about big issues, and delivers quite a few thrills.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #91: Return of the Jedi

If you want someone to give you death stares, tell a die-hard Star Wars fan the original trilogy is not perfect. I am however going to take a risk and write that if there is one major flaw with Return of the Jedi (1983) is a lack of imagination when it comes to the central plot. After the good guys blow up the Death Star in the first movie, the bad guys are almost done building a brand new one, which of course needs to be destroyed again in more or less the same way. Richard Marquand may be directing this time, but it was still George Lucas writing. Plot hole aside, as a kid you can’t help but have fun as the good guys join forces with a tribe of living teddy bears to get the job done. Like many people in their early 30s, I was introduced to the first Star Wars trilogy by my parents who had recorded the movies, commercials included, when they were showing one night on TV. Upon first viewing, a few things stick out in the mind of a young boy watching Return of the Jedi such as:...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...