Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #94: The Wild Bunch


Sam Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch (1969) must be a bit of black sheep for a lot of Western fans. When this genre started out morality was portrayed in a very binary way, with the bad buys wearing black hats and getting shot during an honourable duel by the good guys who were of course wearing white hats. As cinema grew, so did the Western. The line between right and wrong became blurry, especially when Italian filmmaker Sergio Leone introduced Clint Eastwood as a more or less good guy doing bad things to even worse people. However, in Peckinpah’s ultraviolent take on the Western the protagonists are irredeemable bad guys and the people chasing them are definitely not wearing white hats. I’m guessing John Wayne would not have been a fan.

We are now almost a year into the global pandemic and in my part of the world things are so bad I’m not even allowed to go in the streets at night. The good news is at-home entertainment is years away from drying up, and I even found yet another way to watch movies from my list. Cineplex is a cinema chain, and their doors are currently closed, but their website gives users the option to buy or rent movies. This includes classics like The Wild Bunch, which lucky me I had enough points to watch for free. I still look forward to paying to see movies on the big screen though. Westerns are typically filled with sweeping desert shots, train robberies, and horseback chases, which is best experienced on a screen the size of a small house.

The Wild Bunch has a lot of the typical Western elements, but the opening shots of children playing with scorpions being overrun by fire ants quickly lets viewers know things are going to go off the beaten path. For one thing the action is set in 1913, when the cowboys and gunslingers were becoming a thing of the past. Pump action shotguns, automatic pistols, machine guns, grenades, and fancy automobiles have made their way to the West. One character has even heard of a machine that can fly off the ground, as though it was some sort of myth.

With all this new technology comes more bloodshed, and a lot of blood is shed in the movie’s opening gun fight when a gang of bandits tries to rob a railroad office. There is no silver-star wearing sheriff there to stop them, but rather a bunch of trigger-happy bounty hunters who have no qualms about shooting civilians who get in their way. The outlaws are not much better, since throughout the movie they either use women as a human shield or shoot them out of jealousy.

If the outlaws, led by the ageing Pike Bishop (William Holden), have a redeeming trait it is their sense of camaraderie. This is a gang of killers who have been robbing their way through the West for years, and they try to live by a certain code. Bishop’s best friend Dutch (Ernest Borgnine) places a lot of importance on giving your word and much more to who you give your word. The gang’s ex-partner Thornton (Robert Ryan) gave his word to the railroad company that he would help capture the gang to stay out of prison, which is Dutch’s idea of immoral. The old phrase “no honour among thieves” is pushed to the limit in this movie.

Something else you don’t usually see in Westerns is the age of most of the members of the gang. For a bunch of thrill-seeking outlaws, they are getting a bit long in the tooth. A pain in the leg is getting so bad for Pike that he is having trouble getting on his horse. He knows his best days are behind him, so naturally he wishes to pull off the proverbial one last score and back off. Dutch however wonders “Back off to what?”. It’s not like outlaws in Westerns usually have retirement plans.

I read that Peckinpah’s goal with the onscreen violence, which is significant, was to shock audiences with a raw depiction of gunshots and their effect. Unlike the bloodless Westerns he was watching on TV, he didn’t want viewers to have a good time when a character got shot repeatedly. You can’t say he achieved his goal since today there are much more violent movies out there, and audiences do enjoy watching them.

What he did manage to do is make a Western like no other. I have seen a lot of Westerns, both with the old school morality of John Wayne and the grey morality of Clint Eastwood, and I had never seen anything like The Wild Bunch. Through Peckinpah’s camera lenses the American West is not filled with noble sheriffs and cartoonish bandits, but with violent criminals and bounty hunters who will pick the pockets of the civilians they shot by accident. It’s not a poetic depiction of the West, but it’s certainly a bold one. 

The Wild Bunch - Original Theatrical Trailer - YouTube

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #102: The Hustler

Robert Rossen’s The Hustler (1961) is proof that any sport can be used for good cinematic drama even if that sport is pool. Although this is not a game that involves a massive sport arena and bloody boxing gloves, things can get dramatically interesting if the monetary stakes are high, and visually arresting if the filmmakers shoot from the right angle. It also helps a lot if the man putting his money on the table is played by a young Paul Newman in a career-breaking role. Prior to watching the film I had a vague idea of the meaning of the word “hustling” and a rather passive interest in the game of pool. It’s a fun game to play if you are having a couple of nachos and chicken wings on a Friday evening with friends, but I didn’t see it as a spectator sport. Watching The Hustler in the classics section of Netflix two years ago was a bit of an education since it shows the sport as a way of life for some people, and a huge source of revenue for big time gamblers. Newman star as...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...