Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #56: Casino Royale

The James Bond series is without a doubt one of my favourite movie franchises. These movies are two hours of pure fun filled with globetrotting adventures, impossible spy gadgets, femmes fatales and over-the-top villains. You always know what you are going to get with a Bond movie and that has been working well for audiences for decades. Yet after decades the continuity was getting very muddled in a 2006 the guardians of the Bond franchises released Casino Royale, which boldly restarted the franchise at zero with not just a brand new Bond, but also a Bond on his first mission. A risky undertaking, but as with most Bond missions it was a success.

I had first discovered James Bond with Goldeneye, Pierce Brosnan’s first outing as the world famous spy, and then dove into the franchise by watching every movie starring Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton, George Lazenby and of course Sean Connery who launched the series in the first place. It is an interesting franchise in that it reflects the political turmoils of the time, with Connery and Moore occasionally going into Soviet occupied countries and Dalton fighting a Pablo Escobar inspired drug lord in License to Kill. The problem became, are we to seriously believe the character played by Brosnan in Die Another Day in 2002 is the same that Connery played in Dr. No all the way back in 1962?

I imagine the producers in the 1960s probably never imagined the franchise could last this long so they simply kept recasting the actor while sometimes making small references to events of movies that came out decades ago. However with Bond arriving into the 21st century it was clearly time to not only recast but also take the franchise back to its root, hence their decision to adapt the very first book by Ian Fleming, the author of the Bond novels that were used for the early movies. Yet when I first heard that news I was surprised since I had read the novel a few years prior to the movie and there is actually not that much in the way of action in the book. Apart from one major shootout, Bond spends a good part of the novel playing cards against a moneyman for the Soviet Union called LeChiffre. As Deadpool would say, that’s not very cinematic.

This is probably why director Martin Campbell, and screenwriters Paul Haggis, Neal Purvis and Robert Wade, chose to punch things up a little by having Bond do a parkour chase through a construction site early on in Casino Royale. Jason Bourne had stormed the box-office early on in the 2000s with his frenetic energy and the audience was not going to pay to see a spy movie in which the spy just sits down and plays card. Yet at the same time the Bond we see in this rebooted franchise is still very different from Jason Bourne and from all the Bonds that came before.

Played by Daniel Craig, who went under so much scrutiny for the role you would think he was going to marry a member of the royal family, this Bond is a spy who has only ever killed two people by the time the opening credits roll. Q, the provider of the franchise’s amusing gadgets is nowhere to be seen so Bond has to rely on his fists, pistol and wit to get out of deadly situations. LeChiffre, played with effective menace by international treasure Mads Mikkelsen, does not have elaborate torture devices to make Bond talk but instead strips him naked and spanks his testicles with a hard rope. That’s about as back to basic as it can get.

This new take on Bond has not been well received by everyone. Some lament the old days when Bond would use a jet back to escape danger or have to fight a henchman who uses a razor-sharp bowler hat to kill people. This may explain the success of the Kingsman franchise that took the most ridiculous aspects of the Bond franchise and then cranked things up to 11.

I understand these complaints, but I fully accept Daniel Craig as Bond because with him we have a more fleshed out character than with previous incarnations. In Casino Royale we see him struggle with his first kill, wrestle moral quandaries while taking orders from the commanding M (Judi Dench, one of the best actresses in the franchise) and also fall in love. His relationship with Vesper Lynd (Eva Green, who definitely is more than just a Bond girl) affects who he becomes for the rest of his spy career.


Not every character deserves an origin story, but it is fascinating to watch Bond struggle to kill a man in a bathroom early on in the movie and by the end see him confidently shoot a different man in the kneecap before he marches up to him while wearing an expensive suit to utter the immortal line: “The name’s Bond. James Bond.”  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #91: Return of the Jedi

If you want someone to give you death stares, tell a die-hard Star Wars fan the original trilogy is not perfect. I am however going to take a risk and write that if there is one major flaw with Return of the Jedi (1983) is a lack of imagination when it comes to the central plot. After the good guys blow up the Death Star in the first movie, the bad guys are almost done building a brand new one, which of course needs to be destroyed again in more or less the same way. Richard Marquand may be directing this time, but it was still George Lucas writing. Plot hole aside, as a kid you can’t help but have fun as the good guys join forces with a tribe of living teddy bears to get the job done. Like many people in their early 30s, I was introduced to the first Star Wars trilogy by my parents who had recorded the movies, commercials included, when they were showing one night on TV. Upon first viewing, a few things stick out in the mind of a young boy watching Return of the Jedi such as:...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...