Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #151: Gladiator

The words “a Ridley Scott film” can mean a lot of things: a science-fiction film, a thriller, or a straight-up drama. One genre in which he seems to be quite at ease is the swords and sandals epic, and his most successful entry in that genre has been his Oscar-winning Gladiator (2000) with his frequent collaborator Russell Crowe. The story is filled with representations of corruption in politics, how entertainment can be used to distract or win the masses, but mostly it is remembered for the fights on the sand of the arena. This is best encompassed by the hero’s signature scream to the audience: “Are you not entertained?”

Most people watching this movie for the first time might probably link it to other similar epics, but the first thing that popped into my mind and the mind of my parents and brother when we first watched it was, “this sounds an awful lot like the French comic book Astérix.” The opening describes how at this point in history the Roman Empire has vanquished all of its enemies except for a rebellious Germanic tribe. If you have read Astérix, you would understand why we half expected a short moustachioed warrior and his big buddy Obélix to defeat the entire Roman army with their fists. That would have been fun, but it is not quite the tone Scott was going for.

Instead we get Russell Crowe as General Maximus Meridius successfully defeating the Germanic tribe thanks to skills, organizations, and a lot of arrows in a bloody and muddy battlefield. Despite the exhaustive battle, Maximus has the respect and loyalty of his soldiers, while Maximus gives his loyalty to the emperor Marcus Aurelius (the late great Richard Harris). The emperor loves his general like a son, which is a major slap in the face of his actual son Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix) who of course has his eyes on the throne. The battlefield is one thing, but politics is twice as dangerous because there your enemies hide in the shadows

In a true Shakespearean twist, Commodus decides to murder his father after he learns he has offered Maximus the job of emperor in order to reign in the corruption in Rome. The film is remembered for Russell Crowe’s performance, but Joaquin Phoenix is equally great as Commodus and gives a much more nuanced performance. In the scene when the emperor tells him he is not to inherit the throne he seems genuinely hurt and sad, even when he proceeds to choke the life out of his father. Connie Nielsen, who plays Commodus’ sister Lucilla, also has a meaty role since from the moment of her father’s death she is stuck in a life or death situation. She embraces her brother knowing full well what he is what he has done, but only because she also knows what he would do to her son should she get out of line.

Before all the political backstabbing and plotting in Rome takes place, we get to see Maximus go from respected general to slave after Commodus orders his death and that of his family. Captured and sold to Proximo (Oliver Reed, who died during production) a gladiator trainer, Maximus has lost his faith in his gods and his will to live. That is until he learns a gladiator can win his freedom through fame and by being the last man standing in the glorious coliseum in Rome, where the emperor would meet him in person. Freedom sounds nice, but stabbing Commodus on the sands of the arena sounds even better. Maximus’ advantage over the other gladiators is his army training, which allows his to defeat the largest of opponents while rich people are watching him over food and drinks. Now that’s entertainment.


Like many historical films, Gladiator has been criticised for its inaccuracy, and I remember reading somewhere it holds some sort of record for having the most movie mistakes, such as actors still wearing their watches during production. That may be, but once when I see Russell Crowe charging into battle while Hans Zimmer’s heroic theme is playing I am not really thinking about history, I am just thinking this is pretty badass. I will look for historical accuracy in the history books, in the movies I just want to be entertained.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #91: Return of the Jedi

If you want someone to give you death stares, tell a die-hard Star Wars fan the original trilogy is not perfect. I am however going to take a risk and write that if there is one major flaw with Return of the Jedi (1983) is a lack of imagination when it comes to the central plot. After the good guys blow up the Death Star in the first movie, the bad guys are almost done building a brand new one, which of course needs to be destroyed again in more or less the same way. Richard Marquand may be directing this time, but it was still George Lucas writing. Plot hole aside, as a kid you can’t help but have fun as the good guys join forces with a tribe of living teddy bears to get the job done. Like many people in their early 30s, I was introduced to the first Star Wars trilogy by my parents who had recorded the movies, commercials included, when they were showing one night on TV. Upon first viewing, a few things stick out in the mind of a young boy watching Return of the Jedi such as:...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...