Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #173: Memento

Christopher Nolan’s Memento (2000) is fascinating for many reasons, the most obvious being its reverse order that brings the viewers back to the beginning. Or is it the ending? That this was only Nolan’s second film proved this guy is a master storyteller, which is probably why Warner Bros. went to him to resurrect Batman after Joel Schumacher had buried it under layers of campiness in Batman and Robin. The protagonist of Memento probably sees himself as a hero since he is trying to avenge the death of a loved one, but as Nolan would shows in his Dark Knight trilogy sometimes revenge is not black and white.

I first saw the film while I was studying at the University of Sherbrooke and it was being shown in the local film club as part of a double feature along with Nolan’s first movie Following, which seen together can spark interesting conversations about morality. One film has a character following strangers and getting into all sorts of trouble. The second is about a mentally damaged man walking the streets with deadly intentions and no medical supervisions with violent results. Of course the fact that his story is told through a fractured narrative gives you an inkling of what he is going through, making it even more of an enjoyable experience than if it had been told in a straightforward way.

The reason for the story’s jumbled narrative is the fact that protagonist Leonard (Guy Pearce) suffers from a unique form of amnesia that leaves him unable to build any new memories. You talk to him for five to ten minutes and he forgets whom you are. Conveniently enough he does remember how he came to suffer from this situation. While fighting off two men who raped and killed his wife (Jorja Fox) he suffered a sever head trauma. During the struggle he managed to kill one attacker, but the police don’t believe there was a second man. Since Leonard used to be an investigator for an insurance company he sets off to find his wife’s killer.

His mental condition is of course a major roadblock in his quest for justice, but Leonard finds ways around it such as covering his body with tattoos of important names and clues. When he is pressed for time he takes a Polaroid and writes important information underneath. A Polaroid is quite fitting, since the image, like Leonard’s memory, is time sensitive and needs to be shaken to get a better picture. Leonard has to repeat every one of those facts to people he meets around town such as bartender Natalie (Carrie-Ann Moss) and possible ally Teddy (Joe Pantoliano). Of course because of his condition Leonard has no way of knowing if he has explained this to them for the 10th or 100th time, or if they are who they say they are at that moment.

Leonard’s mind is so fractured he could find himself in a room with a beaten up man with no recollection he is the one who was administering the beating mere minutes ago. As if that was not complicated enough, the story advances at two speeds, one presented in black and white with Leonard in his hotel room, and one in colour presented in reverse chronological order as Leonard hones on in his wife’s killer. The two strands eventually meet somewhere in the middle, but as to where this story ends and begins is a very good guess. Either way, imagine the many planning stages this must have required, from the page of Nolan’s screenplay, to the disjointed editing of Dody Dorn. Forget about a plot twist, this thing has a plot maze.

On the film’s limited edition DVD there is an option to see the events in chronological order, which I believe would defeat the point. If Leonard is never sure of what is going on, why should the audience?

This raises an important thematic issue. Leonard always remembers he wants justice, but what if were to wake up at the age of 60 and not remember he found the killer decades ago? Even worse, what if he is not remembering the attack the way it happened in the first place? Quests for revenge have a tendency to cause a lot more harm than good, so we are not off to a good start if the man doing the avenging might be working with unreliable information.


To me the biggest question of Memento is not if Leonard get his revenge, but how is he allowed to walk the streets unsupervised? Then again if he were in a hospital Nolan would not have been able to start building this beautiful puzzle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #49: Evil Dead 2

What do you get when you mix buckets of fake blood, creative camera operators, the humour of the Three Stooges, and a man with the most recognizable chin in Hollywood? You get Evil Dead II (1987), the horror classic that somehow manages to remake the original in the first 15 minutes and yet feel entirely original. Even though it is mostly set in a cabin in the woods, that staple location in the horror genre, it feels like a roller coaster ride. This is especially true once the film's hero, the scrappy Ash Williams, embraces the madness by arming himself with a sawed-off shotgun and attaching a chainsaw where his hand used to be. "Groovy" indeed. This gore-soaked franchise has had a long run, starting off with one low-budget movie directed by a young Sam Raimi and then growing into two sequels, a remake, comic books and a TV show with three seasons. My starting point was the third entry, Army of Darkness, which moves the action to the Middle Ages with the same

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #97: Reservoir Dogs

One of the most surprising things about Quentin Tarantino’s debut film Reservoir Dogs (1992) is the fact that it has never been adapted for the stage. They will make a show out of Beauty and the Beast , Monty Python and the Holy Grail , and even Spider-Man , but somehow a movie in which most of the action takes place in a warehouse has never made it to Broadway? In any case, this was the movie that announced the arrival of the insatiable film fan that could regurgitate everything he had learned watching movies at the video store into stories filled with sudden bursts of violence, sharp-dressed characters, awesome soundtracks, and crackling dialogue.   Since this violent piece of American cinema came out at a time when I was still learning basic math in elementary school there was no way I would watch this on the big screen. However as the years went by it became a cult classic, and even a classic of the independent movies genre, and was re-released on special edition DVD for its

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #102: The Hustler

Robert Rossen’s The Hustler (1961) is proof that any sport can be used for good cinematic drama even if that sport is pool. Although this is not a game that involves a massive sport arena and bloody boxing gloves, things can get dramatically interesting if the monetary stakes are high, and visually arresting if the filmmakers shoot from the right angle. It also helps a lot if the man putting his money on the table is played by a young Paul Newman in a career-breaking role. Prior to watching the film I had a vague idea of the meaning of the word “hustling” and a rather passive interest in the game of pool. It’s a fun game to play if you are having a couple of nachos and chicken wings on a Friday evening with friends, but I didn’t see it as a spectator sport. Watching The Hustler in the classics section of Netflix two years ago was a bit of an education since it shows the sport as a way of life for some people, and a huge source of revenue for big time gamblers. Newman star as