Skip to main content

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #203: Life of Bryan

Many filmmakers have been bold enough to make controversial movies featuring characters from the Bible: Martin Scorsese, Mel Gibson, Darren Aronofsky, and Sir Ridley Scott. However only a select few have been ballsy enough to make a mockery about biblical concepts and that select few is of course Monty Python’s Flying Circus. But to be clear, the character in Life of Brian is not the Messiah: he’s a very naughty boy.

My dad is a big fan of British comedy so as he introduced my brother and I to the Mr. Bean, Black Adder, Fawlty Towers and of course the great works of Mrs. John Cleese, Eric Idle, Michael Palin, Graham Chapman, Terry Gilliam, and Terry Jones. Monty Python and the Holy Grail was the first of their films we saw, which showed me this British troupe of comedians is the funniest troupe of comedians in the world. I got the DVD of Life of Bryan a few Christmases ago, and although I did not think it was as funny as Holy Grail there were still plenty of laughs, not to mention a few poignant messages about religion. Monthy Python’s least funny movie is like a lesser Rolling Stones song: it is still definitely worth adding to your collection.

The Brian of the film is Brian Cohen (Graham Chapman) who has the misfortune of being born right next to where Jesus Christ is born, leading to a bit of confusion for the Three Wise Men. The confusion continues as Brian grows up in Judea running into oddball characters such as an ex-leper, different anti-Roman factions who cannot agree on a name, and rebel Judith (Sue Jones-Davies) whom he meets during Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount where the people in the back can’t hear anything.

Through a series of misunderstandings, everyone from the confused rebels to the Romans led by Pontius Pilate (Michael Palin) and Bickus Dickus (Chapman again) become convinced Brian is indeed the Messiah, despite the protests of his mother (Terry Jones) to the contrary. Brian does not want to be the Messiah either, but the Pythons suggest once a guy says something that sounds convincing enough people will follow his every words. This is indeed how cults are started. Anything unusual that happens around Brian is considered a miracle even though it is just a coincidence, and all Brian wants is to get in bed with Judith.

The movie works not just as a satire of Biblical epics, but also oddly enough as a satire of current upheavals in the Middle East. There are many anti-Roman factions in the city who spend a lot more time fighting each other than the Romans, and cannot decide whether they are the People’s Front of Judea or the Judean People’s Front. One of the groups decides to commit mass suicide as a political statement, which no matter how you frame it is a pretty ridiculous thing to do.

Between the religious and political allegories, Life of Brian was banned from theatres in certain countries decades after it was released. A strange decision for a comedy, but you know what they say: never talk in public about religion, politics, or sex. Life of Brian covers all three subjects, albeit with the Pythonesque sense of humour. This is a comedy people, lighten up.


Better yet, do what Eric Idle does during what is arguably the funniest crucifixion scene ever recorded and “Always Look on the Bright Side of Life.”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine Greatest Movies List - #333: Grease

Nostalgia is a powerful feeling. You have some good times in a period of your life, time goes by and you feel like going back to that time period. I am guessing someone in the late 70s felt nostalgic about late 1950s high school life in America, leading to the creation of “Grease,” one of John Travolta’s first hits. The life and time are very dated today, but every now and then you still hear the soundtrack on classic rock stations. Clearly the lyricists did their jobs right. This is not my favourite musical. It’s cutesy with catchy tunes, but my top two musicals are “The Blues Brothers” and “The Rocky Horror Picture Show.” If it involves car chases, Ray Charles, the Time Warp, Meat Loaf, and Carrie Fisher with a rocket launcher then count me in. I have less enthusiasm for Danny Zucko singing about his summer love for Sandy. But the movie was available for a dollar on iTunes during an evening when I had nothing to do in University, so I might as well kill two hours and ...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #357: The long Goodbye

  Sometimes in a detective story the mystery is not half as fun as the detective stuck in the chaos of the story. Philip Marlow is one of those detectives. His name is synonymous with Hollywood noir and in The Long Goodbye (1973), he dives deep into a mystery involving a murder, then a suicide, then a missing person, and eventually a very violent gangster operating in sunny Los Angeles. One thing I love about this version is that this detective loves his cat enough to go buy him food at three o’clock in the morning. Now that is a dedicated pet lover. The late great director Robert Altman starts the action at a slow pace to introduce Marlowe (Eliott Gould) as he wakes up to his hungry cat. Here is a man who falls asleep in his clothes, always the same suit and tie, and is either constantly smoking or lighting a new cigarette. He is a friendly person, nice enough to pick up an item for his neighbours while going out to get cat food. It probably helps that said neighbours are five y...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #20: Blade Runner

  Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (1982) is one of those movies that gets more relevant with each passing decade. Set in a (now passed) future in which Los Angeles is overrun with people and pollution, the story focuses on artificial lifeforms clashing with their human creators. As the chase for these lifeforms progresses, writers Hampton Francher and David Peoples imply they may not be so different from the humans chasing them. If this sounds topical in 2024, imagine how relevant it will sound ten years from now. When writing these amateur reviews, I usually try to think back on the first time I watched the movie and what I felt at the time. This is tricky with Blade Runner considering there have been five versions of the film released since the 1980s. I believe the first version I did see on TV was the original theatrical version with the narration to guide the audience since executives thought that was needed. I eventually disagreed and purchased the Final Cut on Blu-Ray to see th...