Skip to main content

Empire Magazine Greatest Movies List - #235: Battle Royale

Every now and then a movie comes along that challenges the limits of what violent content can be shown on the big screen. Somehow, many of these movies often come from Asia. Make of that what you will, but the fact is in the year 2000 the Japanese film Battle Royale went where no American movie would ever dare go. The concept of school children killing each other on an island is of course a demented satire, full of exaggerated violence and gallons of blood spilled by an arsenal of weapons, but for 11 years it was never released in the United States or Canada. Controversial? That was actually a selling point.

It took me a while to get to this movie, but I definitely heard about it for years. I first saw the trailer at a cinema while living in South America, but since I was around 13 years old at the time I was way too young to see it. Given the brief glimpses of violence of what I saw in the trailer I am not sure I wanted to anyway. By that time I was in college in Quebec City in 2004 the film had of course gained a cult audience. Some of my fellow students were playing clips of the movie in a classroom when there were no teachers around and laughed at the violence, even if the characters on screen weren’t much older than them. Finally, in the year 2012 after my brother gave me an iTunes card for my birthday I decided it was about time to see what all the fuss was about when Battle Royale was available to rent for 99 cents. This was the same year The Hunger Games movie came out, and although there are thematic similarities I quickly realized we are talking about two different beasts here.

Directed by Kinji Fukasaku and written by his son, Battle Royale is set in a dystopian world where chaos in schools has reached an alarming level. They say kids today have no respect and teacher Kitano (Takeshi Kitano) truly believes this after a student randomly stabs him in a hallway. One year later Kitano’s class are on their way to a very special field trip. Their bus is gassed and when the students wake up they are surprised to find themselves in a class with their former teacher and with collars around their necks. Kitano explains they have been chosen to participate in a special government-sponsored game in which they have three days to kill each other, much to their disbeliefs. To drive the point home, he throws a knife to a student’s head because she wouldn’t stop talking.

To explain the rules of the game, Kitano plays a surprisingly cheerful video. As if this was just a game of laser tag, a Japanese girl instructs with a smile that the students are on an island divided in different danger zones, they each have one weapon of varying efficiency, and whoever is left standing after three days wins the game. Break the rules, and the collar around their necks explodes. Realizing the nightmare is real, the students take their weapons and make a run for it.

The first deaths happen just the way you think they would. Some students shoot each other by accidents, a few decide to commit suicide by jumping off a cliff, and quite a few get killed by the ones who actually know what they are doing. Kazuo Kiriyama (Masanobu Ando) actually asked to be transferred to the island because he enjoys this game and is frighteningly good at killing people. When he shows up, you better pray you can run faster than the guy next to you.

As time goes by, the surviving students spread out into different groups. Old grudges and petty jealousies suddenly become motives for murder. A girl who was a bitch in middle school is now a psychotic who will stab you in the crotch with a machete. Alliances are formed only to be broken when a shot is fired by accident. Luckily there are a few smart ones who decide to be smart and try to game the system by hacking the island’s mainframe and possibly getting those damn collars off.

So what is the whole point of this madness? Is it an extreme version of the conflict between students and authority figures? Is it a satire of reality television? Perhaps the filmmakers, and the author of the original manga on which it is based, merely wanted to shock people with what human beings could be capable of when pushed beyond the breaking point.


Either way, Battle Royale certainly deserves its cult status. The acting varies in quality with each actor, but the story and unapologetic violence takes viewers on one hell of a ride. It leaves you bruised, battered, and yes, even laughing.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #91: Return of the Jedi

If you want someone to give you death stares, tell a die-hard Star Wars fan the original trilogy is not perfect. I am however going to take a risk and write that if there is one major flaw with Return of the Jedi (1983) is a lack of imagination when it comes to the central plot. After the good guys blow up the Death Star in the first movie, the bad guys are almost done building a brand new one, which of course needs to be destroyed again in more or less the same way. Richard Marquand may be directing this time, but it was still George Lucas writing. Plot hole aside, as a kid you can’t help but have fun as the good guys join forces with a tribe of living teddy bears to get the job done. Like many people in their early 30s, I was introduced to the first Star Wars trilogy by my parents who had recorded the movies, commercials included, when they were showing one night on TV. Upon first viewing, a few things stick out in the mind of a young boy watching Return of the Jedi such as:...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...