Skip to main content

Empire Magazine Greatest Movies List - #484: The Fountain

George Carlin once said the answer to the age-old question “why are we here” just might be: “Plastic! Assholes!” That is way too simple of an answer for most people, so for thousands of years people have been debating about the meaning of life, what happens after death, and why the bloody hell do we have to die in the first place. The Fountain (2006) by Darren Aronofsky is a convoluted exploration of some of those questions as it follows a version of the same character in three different eras. In each he seeks eternal life, not for him but for the love of his life. It helps she is played by Rachel Weisz.

Before the movie was released it gained notoriety for its troubled production, as it had to shut down because of production costs. If I recall well, they were even auctioning off props of the movie at one point. But then Aronofsky tinkered the script, found ways to make the effects for cheap, and shot the whole thing in Montreal to save money. Upon its release it did not exactly set the box office on fire and the critics had mixed reviews, but it has apparently gained a cult following. As for me, as I am writing this I got to cross the movie off the Empire list last week after I found it on iTunes as part of their 99 cents weekly special. By an odd coincidence, that’s the same week I watched Terence Malick’s The Tree of Life, which also has a convoluted plotline and themes of life and death. This says a lot about Terence Malick, but I found The Fountain to be marginally more accessible.

Aronofsky’s film stars Hugh Jackman as three characters all on the same quest. In the first sequence he is Tomas, a conquistador at the service of Queen Isabella of Spain (Rachel Weisz). The Queen has sent him to South America to find the mythical Tree of Life, which is in effect the fountain of youth. If Tomas succeeds the Queen hopes it will put an end to a conflict between her and the church and she also promises to spend eternity with Tomas as the new Adam and Eve.

Sometime in the modern-day world Jackman is Tom Creo, a doctor experimenting on chimps with samples from a tree found in South America. Tom is working obsessively to find a cure for his girlfriend Izzy (Weisz again) who is dying from a brain tumour. Even when the tree’s sample delivers amazing results Tom is angry since it has not achieved his ultimate goal: to beat death.

Finally in an unspecified future Jackman plays Tommy, a man travelling through space on some sort of dome-like ship. Inside the ship is a tree, which seemingly holds the soul of Weisz’s soul. Tommy is bald, dressed like a monk, covered in tattoos, and can float inside the ship’s bubble. Once again he is trying to stop his love from dying and fears he might be too late.

Each of these narratives, which could have been separate movies, are connected through various key objects and flashbacks. The Izzie in the present is writing a book about Mayans and conquistadors, which could be the story of Tomas. In outer space Tommy is tattooing his body with ink Izzie gave Tom. Camera shots and lighting echo through each story implying this is all happening to the same person.

This is of course open to interpretation and maybe Aronofsky himself does not know what it all means. The most accessible segment is of course the one that takes place in the present when Tom the doctor is trying to “cure” death. Weisz beautifully plays Izzie as a young woman who has accepted her early demise and even sees beauty if death. She tells Tom of her Mayan studies and of a legend that states that out of death there can also be rebirth. Maybe in the future segment Tommy is on a quest to create that rebirth. Or maybe Tom is just dreaming the whole thing.

This is certainly deep stuff and you could write books about all the themes and ideas evoked. As a movie it is challenging to follow, but it is beautifully shot and both Jackman and Weisz are great no matter whom they are playing.


Now here is a challenge: try watching The Fountain and The Tree of Life as a double feature. If you don’t have any weed, it might be the next best thing.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #91: Return of the Jedi

If you want someone to give you death stares, tell a die-hard Star Wars fan the original trilogy is not perfect. I am however going to take a risk and write that if there is one major flaw with Return of the Jedi (1983) is a lack of imagination when it comes to the central plot. After the good guys blow up the Death Star in the first movie, the bad guys are almost done building a brand new one, which of course needs to be destroyed again in more or less the same way. Richard Marquand may be directing this time, but it was still George Lucas writing. Plot hole aside, as a kid you can’t help but have fun as the good guys join forces with a tribe of living teddy bears to get the job done. Like many people in their early 30s, I was introduced to the first Star Wars trilogy by my parents who had recorded the movies, commercials included, when they were showing one night on TV. Upon first viewing, a few things stick out in the mind of a young boy watching Return of the Jedi such as:...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...