Skip to main content

Empire List #496: Superman Returns


I have mixed feelings about this one. On the one hand it was a great feeling to go see a Superman movie on the big screen for the first time and to see Kevin Spacey do an impeccable job as archvillain Lex Luthor. On the other hand, having already seen three Superman movies on the small screen and many TV episodes, whether animated or live action, I didn’t feel that “Superman Returns” brought anything new to the table: same villain, same on/off relationship with Lois Lane, and same evil plot.

This new Superman movie came out in 2006, years after the disaster that was “Superman IV: The Quest for Peace” and one year after the release of “Batman Begin” which had grounded the superhero genre in a more dramatic and realistic landscape. Suffice to say that the bar was high. I felt that the movie was in good hands knowing that it had been made by Bryan Singer who had done a great job with the first two “X-Men” movies and had made one of the best crime movies of the 90s, “The Usual Suspects,” when teamed him up with Kevin Spacey.

So in the summer of 2006 I entered the Cineplex Odeon in Quebec City hoping to have a good time. I was just happy that it was in English and not dubbed in French for one thing. Ever since I had gotten back from South America I had to deal with the fact that maybe there is one big movie that comes out in its original version in Quebec City. The rest of the time they are re-recorded by French actors, and if there is cheesy dialogue in the original version, I find that is even cheesier when it’s translated.

But on that particular occasion I was lucky enough to be able to enjoy a big Hollywood movie during what was turning out to be a stressful summer. I had just finished two years of CEGEP (a pre-university program in Quebec), I was doing a mediocre summer job (telemarketer), and in a few weeks I was heading for the University of Sherbrooke. Some escapism was needed.

From the very beginning you can tell that Singer has a lot of love for the first movie, since he uses the same music originally composed by John Williams for the opening credits as the camera zooms across the galaxy. It’s a clear message: the Superman we know and love from Richard Donner’s original movie is coming home. Later there is an homage to Superman’s first night of fighting crime in the city of Metropolis from the first movie, only this time special effects allow for a shot in which a criminal shoots a bullet aimed at Superman’s eye and the bullet bounces off his retina.

With permission from Marlon Brando’s estate, Singer even manages to bring back Superman’s father, played by Brando, despite the fact that the actor had died two years before the movie was released.

No doubt about it this movie has thousands of amazing special effects sequences, such as when Superman rescues an out-of-control plane, or when an island emerges out of the Atlantic, and when Superman actually lifts that island to throw it into outer space. Yet oddly enough I found some of the flight scenes from the earlier movies to be somewhat more realistic. Maybe it’s the costume. In the original movie Christopher Reeves was wearing a costume that looked like real cloth while flying in front of a green screen with superimposed footage. In this news version, the emblem on Brandon Routh’s costume looks like it’s made out of plastic and his cape looks artificially animated. As a result, I got the feeling I was looking at a cartoon shooting through the sky.

Speaking of which, Brandon Routh is great as Superman since he resembles Reeves a lot. Yet as Clark Kent, he comes off as weaker than he needs to be. When Kent learns that as a result of Superman’s prolonged absence from Earth, Lois Lane has a son and will soon be married, he mopes off to a bar and stares down a glass. I know that Clark Kent is the weaker half of the two people who share that body, but come on! Man up!

My biggest problem with the movie is with Lex Luthor’s evil plan. Because Superman was absent from Earth for years and could not testify against him, he was paroled and has been plotting a big revenge/comeback scheme ever since. Not much of a plan: once again Luthor plans to cause a major catastrophe that is related to real estate, this time using technology he found at Superman’s lair, and once again he will use Kryptonite to try to kill Superman. By now, shouldn’t Superman anticipate this? In the animated series I used to watch in the late 90’s a scientist had actually been smart enough to build a radiation suit to protect Superman. It makes sense. It’s his only weakness in the entire universe, shouldn’t he be thinking of a way to withstand it?

One interesting new character is Jason (Tristan Lake Leabu) Lois Lane’s son. The kid is at first quite uninteresting as he is always puffing on an inhaler. However, it becomes quite clear that his father is not Richard White (James Marsden) Lois’ fiancée, when Jason hurls a piano at a henchman that was threatening his mother. I had never seen a version of any Superman story in which he has a son, so it would be very interesting to see where that particular storyline could go in other movies.

As of this year, the rumours are that Christopher Nolan, he who reinvented the superhero genre with “Batman Begins” and “The Dark Knight,” will produce the next movie. I anticipate a solid story and I hope he hires Kevin Spacey to once again play Luthor, but I hope new villains are introduced. As far as I am concerned, the best movie in this franchise is “Superman II” because in that one Superman had to fight three supervillains who had the same powers he did. Talk about a triple threat. Also next time, enough with the kryptonite, it’s getting old.    


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #147: Notorious

Alfred Hitchcock’s Notorious (1946) has many of the master director’s signature elements: spies, lies, a handsome leading man, a domineering mother, and of course a MacGuffin. As it is set after World War II the villains are logically former Nazis, but the plot is so tense in many scenes that it remains an effective thriller to this day. It also bears a huge influence on John Woo’s Mission Impossible 2 , which retains plot elements and similar dialogue, but of course has more explosions than all of Hitchcock’s films put together. Notorious is so well-made it can be studies in film classes, which is exactly what I did while taking a course on Hollywood Cinema 1930-1960 during the summer of 2009 at the University of British Columbia. As this is Hitchcock we are talking about here, there are subtler things to analyze than explosions in Notorious , no offense to the skills of Mr. John Woo. Famously there is a kissing scene between stars Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman that seemingly las...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #91: Return of the Jedi

If you want someone to give you death stares, tell a die-hard Star Wars fan the original trilogy is not perfect. I am however going to take a risk and write that if there is one major flaw with Return of the Jedi (1983) is a lack of imagination when it comes to the central plot. After the good guys blow up the Death Star in the first movie, the bad guys are almost done building a brand new one, which of course needs to be destroyed again in more or less the same way. Richard Marquand may be directing this time, but it was still George Lucas writing. Plot hole aside, as a kid you can’t help but have fun as the good guys join forces with a tribe of living teddy bears to get the job done. Like many people in their early 30s, I was introduced to the first Star Wars trilogy by my parents who had recorded the movies, commercials included, when they were showing one night on TV. Upon first viewing, a few things stick out in the mind of a young boy watching Return of the Jedi such as:...

Empire Magazine (2008) Greatest Movies List - #85: Blue Velvet

Exactly how do you describe a David Lynch movie? He is one of the few directors whose style is so distinctive that his last name has become an adjective. According to Urban Dictionary, the definition of Lynchian is: “having the same balance between the macabre and the mundane found in the works of filmmaker David Lynch.” To see a prime example of that adjective film lovers need look no further than Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986), which does indeed begin in the mundane before slowly sinking in macabre violence. My first introduction to the world of David Lynch was through his ground breaking, but unfortunately interrupted, early 1990s TV series Twin Peaks . This was one of the first television shows to grab viewers with a series-long mystery: who killed Laura Palmer? A mix of soap opera, police procedural, and the supernatural, it is a unique show that showed the darkness hidden in suburbia and remains influential to this day. Featuring Kyle MacLachlan as an FBI investigator with a l...